Simon Krajewski
Simon Krajewski
Note: This was partially allowed in Haxe 3 as well. It was supposed to work in all patterns, but didn't correctly parse at toplevel-patterns. However, this should have worked in...
This leads to the old "is Void a type" discussion. I agree the original isn't 100% accurate, but IMO your change isn't any better (and has weird grammar). I'll leave...
I see this issue and immediately ask myself "wtf is @:callable"...
We can link these from the appropriate pages, sure. I don't think we should go beyond that because the overall style of your documentation is very different from the rest...
It should be mentioned there, but I think the full documentation should go to the target-details chapter.
The sections are there but have no content. I don't know how to structure them yet either.
@nadako: Are you gonna document this for 3.2. or should I assign to @frabbit?
I don't really know what it's about but we should certainly address it before 3.2. :)
I agree we should align with haxe formatter for all code-related styling.