Error in paper? Figure 1

[Faur]

I am wondering if there isn't an error in Figure 1. In order to get m=256 in the last conv. layer there must be a skip connection around the last dense block in the upsampling path, which is valid, since there aren't any transition up blocks

[decrispell]

I believe you are right - See Issues #9 and #19.

[Faur]

Yes, thank you!

[pjohh]

According to your code and my understanding of the functionality of a dense block, there should also be a concatenation "around" the bottleneck dense block (concatenate input and output of bottleneck), otherwise number of feature maps dosen't match ... Am I right?