feat(blocks): add a generic webhook block

[ntindle]

I want to be able to insert data into the graph as a webhook from various services without making a provider specific webhook for things like discord, slack, uptime bots, etc.

Changes 🏗️

• Adds a generic webhook block that others can use

Checklist 📋

For code changes:

• [x] I have clearly listed my changes in the PR description
• [x] I have made a test plan
• [x] I have tested my changes according to the test plan:
  • [x] Test the endpoint that is generated with a graph, making sure to pass data and consts to it

[qodo-code-review[bot]]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 Security concerns Potential JSON Injection: The webhook accepts arbitrary JSON data from external sources without validation. This could potentially lead to unexpected behavior if malicious data is sent. Consider adding validation or sanitization for the incoming payload, especially if this data will be used in database operations or passed to other systems.

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Incorrect Description The block description mentions "compass transcription" which seems to be copied from another block and doesn't match the purpose of this generic webhook block. description="This block will output the contents of the compass transcription.", Typo in Variable The variable name example_paylod has a typo (should be example_payload) and is referenced in multiple places. example_paylod = {"message": "Hello, World!"}

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Deploy Preview for auto-gpt-docs-dev canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	2b90eb7c8b16516908f1ab9275547233ca9e6122
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/auto-gpt-docs-dev/deploys/67ec569db99c7f0008c126d4

[deepsource-io[bot]]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits f23b754..2b90eb7. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
JavaScript	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Python	✅ Success	❗ 1 occurence introduced	View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[AutoGPT-Agent]

The PR does not meet all requirements. Issues found: 1) The PR template contains a partial checklist (configuration section is present but not filled out, should be removed if not applicable). 2) The PR appears to be related to webhook functionality but there's no mention or explanation of potential user_id handling impacts for data/.py files (though in this case there don't appear to be any data/.py changes). However, the core functionality and purpose is clearly explained, the changes are well-scoped, and the test plan is appropriate for the changes being made.

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Deploy Preview for auto-gpt-docs canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	2b90eb7c8b16516908f1ab9275547233ca9e6122
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/auto-gpt-docs/deploys/67ec569d14ed050008088dc5

[AutoGPT-Agent]

The PR appears to be insufficient based on the provided rules. While it has a proper conventional commit title format and the changes appear to be in scope, the PR template is only partially filled out. The PR is missing important sections like configuration changes (which should be removed if not applicable rather than left unchecked), and the test plan is very minimal with only one test item compared to the example provided.

[AutoGPT-Agent]

The PR appears to be insufficient based on the required criteria. While it has a proper conventional commit style title with scope and the changes are focused (not exceeding 20% out of scope), there are several issues: 1) The changes in data/*.py were not applicable to review for user_id concerns as no such files were modified. 2) The description is quite minimal and could be more detailed. 3) The test plan is very basic with only one test point, compared to the template example which shows much more comprehensive testing scenarios. 4) The checklist sections for configuration changes was not removed despite being not applicable, it was just left unchecked.

[AutoGPT-Agent]

The PR appears to be insufficient based on the provided rules. Issues include: 1) Not enough details in the 'Changes' section - it only mentions adding a generic webhook block without specifics about the implementation details or affected components 2) The test plan is very minimal and only includes one test case, where more comprehensive testing would be expected for a new webhook feature 3) The code changes include new files and modifications to existing ones which are not properly documented in the changes section.

[AutoGPT-Agent]

The PR fails several requirements: 1) The PR title has a scope but it's too generic ('blocks' should be more specific), 2) The test plan is minimal and doesn't follow the example format provided in the template, 3) The configuration section of the checklist wasn't removed despite being not applicable. Also, the description of changes could be more detailed about what exactly was added and how it works.

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request has conflicts with the base branch, please resolve those so we can evaluate the pull request.

[github-actions[bot]]

Conflicts have been resolved! 🎉 A maintainer will review the pull request shortly.