AutoGPT
AutoGPT copied to clipboard
partial google oauth support implementation
I'm just pushing this so people working on a proper implementation can pull code or inspiration from it. This PR is not intended to be completed or merged.
- feat(forge/file_storage): Add Google Drive support
- feat(server): Add Read File block with support for Google Drive and GCS
- move
get_user_idfrom server.py to utils.py - implement
POST /api/integrations/auth/google - draft
LinkGoogleDriveButton - add
google-auth-oauthlibfor backend
Deploy Preview for auto-gpt-docs ready!
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | 5c62abf69467b571b18794739045b4c96b6e0674 |
| Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/auto-gpt-docs/deploys/66c355f0ac99e60008688ffe |
| Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-7828--auto-gpt-docs.netlify.app |
| Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 0.68966% with 144 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Please upload report for BASE (
dev@183c72b). Learn more about missing BASE report.
| Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| forge/forge/file_storage/google_drive.py | 0.00% | 139 Missing :warning: |
| forge/forge/file_storage/__init__.py | 16.66% | 5 Missing :warning: |
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #7828 +/- ##
======================================
Coverage ? 56.46%
======================================
Files ? 107
Lines ? 5910
Branches ? 736
======================================
Hits ? 3337
Misses ? 2460
Partials ? 113
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | 56.46% <0.68%> (?) |
|
| forge | 56.46% <0.68%> (?) |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This pull request has conflicts with the base branch, please resolve those so we can evaluate the pull request.
@Pwuts im assuming we can close this?
@Pwuts can we close this? not sure what we want to do now that the behaviors have diverged a bit