AutoGPT
AutoGPT copied to clipboard
fix(ops/issues): update template for bugs
User description
Background
We added more LLM Providers, so we should support them in the bug template
Changes 🏗️
Adds new providers to the bug list
PR Quality Scorecard ✨
- [x] Have you used the PR description template?
+2 pts - [ ] Is your pull request atomic, focusing on a single change?
+5 pts - [ ] Have you linked the GitHub issue(s) that this PR addresses?
+5 pts - [ ] Have you documented your changes clearly and comprehensively?
+5 pts - [ ] Have you changed or added a feature?
-4 pts- [ ] Have you added/updated corresponding documentation?
+4 pts - [ ] Have you added/updated corresponding integration tests?
+5 pts
- [ ] Have you added/updated corresponding documentation?
- [ ] Have you changed the behavior of AutoGPT?
-5 pts- [ ] Have you also run
agbenchmarkto verify that these changes do not regress performance?+10 pts
- [ ] Have you also run
PR Type
documentation
Description
- Updated the bug report template to reflect the addition of new LLM providers.
- Changed the dropdown label from "Do you use OpenAI GPT-3 or GPT-4?" to "What LLM Provider do you use?".
- Added "Anthropic" and "Llamafile" as options in the LLM provider dropdown.
Changes walkthrough 📝
| Relevant files | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation |
|
💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment
/helpon the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions
PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT/commit/71f894024fac533cd477f98eba612126bc75c2b4)
- [ ] Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍
| ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] |
1 |
| 🧪 Relevant tests |
No |
| 🔒 Security concerns |
No |
| ⚡ Key issues to review |
None |
Deploy Preview for auto-gpt-docs canceled.
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | fb66b4ae81c798effa4e37edbe42a95049bbf543 |
| Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/auto-gpt-docs/deploys/669e4db13bfe650008d49f34 |
PR Code Suggestions ✨
No code suggestions found for PR.
Changed scope from docs to ops/issues. Lmk what you think.
sounds good
Add commit hash to the requirement for this - @Torantulino
We also have Groq provider
@ntindle Can we get this merged or closed today. It's be lying around for a while.
I see there a few comments on what could be done.
As long as its better than what we currently have, it should be merged and another PR can be made when there is time to improve on this.