Yongshun Shreck Ye

icon indicating an email [email protected]

icon company @huanshankeji icon location Chengdu icon location Kotlin full stack developer, programming language theory / type theory enthusiast

Results 32 comments of Yongshun Shreck Ye

Can't encode a nullable `ByteArray` without a default argument in Protobuf (it currently maps to Protobuf `bytes`, so should not be treated as a Protobuf collection type and should be allowed to be optional)

@pdvrieze Thanks. The solution given by @shanshin above also works without a wrapper. I think the question here is: does the current implementation map `ByteArray` to repeated `int32`s or `bytes`?...

Can't encode a nullable `ByteArray` without a default argument in Protobuf (it currently maps to Protobuf `bytes`, so should not be treated as a Protobuf collection type and should be allowed to be optional)

My opinion is yes.