Should we support `ActiveRecord::Store`?

[sambostock]

Our application uses ActiveRecord::Store, but Tapioca does not support it, so we had to write a shim. I began investigating adding it, but while looking for where to implement it I discovered we support ActiveRecord::TypedStore.

Before I go any further, I'd like to establish the project's stance:

• Are we open to supporting ActiveRecord::Store, or
• do we recommend consumers use ActiveRecord::TypedStore instead?

I should note that I only found out about TypedStore because I looked into adding support for Store. If we prefer one over the other, we could, for example, log a message if we detect the host app uses ActiveRecord::Store advising they switch.

[rafaelfranca]

Using ActiveRecord::Store is fine, so we should support it.

[dom-binti]

As far as I can tell, the TypedStore compiler doesn't support things like prefix and suffix, presumably because those aren't persisted anywhere on the object. ActiveRecord::Store has the same limitation -- is it ok to add an ActiveRecord::Store compiler that only support basic usage without prefix/suffix/etc?