Allow to create contract-based specifications with some local overrides

[isaacroldan]

WHY are these changes introduced?

Refactors the createContractBasedModuleSpecification function to accept a single object parameter instead of multiple arguments, making the API more flexible and consistent.

WHAT is this pull request doing?

• Modifies createContractBasedModuleSpecification to accept a configuration object with identifier, appModuleFeatures, and buildConfig properties
• Updates all calls to this function throughout the codebase
• Simplifies the channel specification implementation by leveraging the contract-based module specification

How to test your changes?

1. Run the extension specification tests to ensure they pass
2. Create a new channel extension to verify the specification works correctly
3. Verify that existing extensions using contract-based module specifications continue to function properly

Measuring impact

How do we know this change was effective? Please choose one:

• [x] n/a - this doesn't need measurement, e.g. a linting rule or a bug-fix
• [ ] Existing analytics will cater for this addition
• [ ] PR includes analytics changes to measure impact

Checklist

• [x] I've considered possible cross-platform impacts (Mac, Linux, Windows)
• [x] I've considered possible documentation changes

[isaacroldan]

• #6628 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[github-actions[bot]]

We detected some changes at packages/*/src and there are no updates in the .changeset. If the changes are user-facing, run pnpm changeset add to track your changes and include them in the next release CHANGELOG.

[!CAUTION] DO NOT create changesets for features which you do not wish to be included in the public changelog of the next CLI release.

[github-actions[bot]]

Coverage report

St.:grey_question:	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🟡	Statements	79.25% (+0.02% 🔼)	13582/17139
🟡	Branches	73.14% (+0.03% 🔼)	6632/9068
🟡	Functions	79.41% (+0.04% 🔼)	3505/4414
🟡	Lines	79.6% (+0.02% 🔼)	12828/16116

Show files with reduced coverage 🔻

St.:grey_question:	File	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
🟡	... / specification.ts	68.52% (-0.57% 🔻)	74.36% (+1.19% 🔼)	76.47% (-1.31% 🔻)	68.09% (-0.66% 🔻)

Test suite run success

3356 tests passing in 1372 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 9ae216cec1ebf904db2266f3a0a0fb41fdb57f6a