Shahim Essaid

I think it's good to get the enum names/schemas in the overall schema even if they are empty. I think that's a more meaningful schema even if the enum's content...

Being able to $ref the enums is more valuable than their content, as long as the enum names are somewhat stable, or can be updated with a regex.

_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/115850439786749293234/) on April 13, 2014 17:49:59_ Hi Kotoko! Yes, this would be useful for GO. I think this should be recommended (but not required) for an OBO Basic ontology...

_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/102674886352087815907/) on April 15, 2014 02:37:40_ Shouldn't the -simple versions also follow this? Don't see any reason to keep redundancy in, and simplifying the graph would be good for...

_From [[email protected]](https://code.google.com/u/112348074460189721737/) on July 02, 2014 13:33:07_ BTW, this is what OWLGraphManipulator#reduceRelations() does. In the old owltools way (without reasonner), but it works. Maybe you could add some command line...