DLFS_code
DLFS_code copied to clipboard
clarification in chap1
In the below code, could you clarify why are calculating dLdN when you are not using in subsequent calculations
dLdS = np.ones_like(S)
dSdN = deriv(sigma, N)
dLdN = dLdS * dSdN
dNdX = np.transpose(W, (1, 0))
dLdX = np.dot(dSdN, dNdX)
return dLdX
I have the same question: Why element-wise multiplication is applied to calculate dLdN = dLdS*dSdN, rather than matrix multiplication via either np.dot() or np.matmul()?
I assume this is to make the dimensionality of the rest derivatives correct, as shown in the comment following each derivative. But, I'm still confused...
def matrix_function_backward_sum_1(X: ndarray,
W: ndarray,
sigma: Array_Function) -> ndarray:
'''
Compute derivative of matrix function with a sum with respect to the
first matrix input
'''
assert X.shape[1] == W.shape[0] # X: (m x n), W: (n x p)
# matrix multiplication
N = np.dot(X, W) # N: (m x p)
# feeding the output of the matrix multiplication through sigma
S = sigma(N) # S: (m x p)
# sum all the elements
L = np.sum(S) # L: a scalar
# note: I'll refer to the derivatives by their quantities here,
# unlike the math where we referred to their function names
# dLdS - just 1s
dLdS = np.ones_like(S) # (m x p)
# dSdN
dSdN = deriv(sigma, N) # (m x p)
# dLdN (element-wise multiplication)
dLdN = dLdS * dSdN # (m x p)
# dNdX
dNdX = np.transpose(W, (1, 0)) # (p x n)
# dLdX
dLdX = np.dot(dSdN, dNdX) # (m x p) x (p x n) = (m x n)
return dLdX