Kamal Ahmad

Should be good to go now! Some notes: - This PR despite the usual unit tests was tested using [ergovalidation](https://github.com/SethDusek/ergovalidation) which downloads transactions from node (requires extra indexing to be...

Should I rebase this to #930? Also are there any formatting guidelines? There doesn't seem to be any mention of proper formatting in CONTRIBUTING.md.

CI should be good to go now! Added new version tests for V3, please take a look at those as well

Please re-run CI, I believe this CI failure was due to an issue in the underlying branch and not this PR itself. Github doesn't seem to automatically re-run CI for...

I would like to attempt this.

Hi, some questions regarding this. I've accumulated the deserialization cost, but this presents some issues: - Wouldn't this technically be a soft-fork? (I'm guessing this shouldn't apply to versions earlier...

Hi, another question regarding this. Should this only apply if both v6.0 is activated and the ErgoTree version is >= 3, or should it apply to any version of ergotree...