Sergio Pedri
Sergio Pedri
Likely a duplicate of #https://github.com/CommunityToolkit/dotnet/issues/343, should be fixed now with the latest SDK 🙂
This is not something we're planning on adding. Furthermore, it would also likely make the codegen worse. Extensibility is something that should eventually be solved once C# gets support for...
It's not a half-baked feature. The fact it's not extensible doesn't make it so, that just wasn't one of the design goals. Furthermore, as I've mentioned, switching to instance methods...
Closing this as it seems resolved, and yeah it's something that can easily be done externally like shown above. Thank you @mikechristiansenvae to take the time to help out and...
Yup, just tried again and I'm still seeing VS 17.3.2. Plus this week is thanksgiving, so I guess maybe end of next one? 😅
Just tried again and I'm also seeing VS 17.4 and the .NET 7 SDK in all my CI runs! 🎉
Mmmh... Rebased after #1020 to trigger the CI, and it's failing with these errors: ``` Failed to download package 'CommunityToolkit.Mvvm.8.2.0' from 'https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/ms/fef2e43c-84a1-4265-b74c-b824d387dd06/_packaging/3989942b-0a74-47bc-a7e3-ba19148bd858/nuget/v3/flat2/communitytoolkit.mvvm/8.2.0/communitytoolkit.mvvm.8.2.0.nupkg'. Response status code does not indicate success: 401...
Oh I see, didn't know you needed explicit approval on individual package versions (I don't think that's enabled by default). Thank you for approving it and re-triggering the CI! 🙂
Closing this for now. The fact it can't run in realtime also makes it not really ideal for the sample app. We might reconsider porting the version from Paint.NET in...
> "It is imperative that we not use PolySharp on any assembly used as a reference assembly to another. For source generator projects, it's probably not going to be a...