[Improved reporting] Add link for Allure Report
User description
It's a pretty popular reporting framework that allow you to have a fancy reports with minimum changes in the code, with detailed information about each step a test did with a proper hierarchy.
Thanks for contributing to the Selenium site and documentation! A PR well described will help maintainers to review and merge it quickly
Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines. Avoid large PRs, and help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.
Description
Added one link for pretty popular framework for reports.
Motivation and Context
It's free, it can be used with any language / framework and suits Mobile , Web and API tests, super alive, shows great report with all details (step name, time, provided data, responses).
Types of changes
- [x] Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
- [ ] Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
- [ ] Improved translation
- [ ] Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)
Checklist
- [x] I have read the contributing document.
- [] I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.
PR Type
Documentation
Description
-
Added Allure Report link to improved reporting documentation
-
Provides framework-agnostic reporting solution for tests
Diagram Walkthrough
flowchart LR
A["improved_reporting.en.md"] -- "Add Allure Report link" --> B["Documentation with reporting frameworks"]
File Walkthrough
| Relevant files | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation |
|
Deploy request for selenium-dev pending review.
Visit the deploys page to approve it
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | 349be8742ff290722b0154abc6163f2d15e42ffc |
PR Compliance Guide 🔍
Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
| Security Compliance | |
| 🟢 | No security concerns identifiedNo security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code. |
| Ticket Compliance | |
| ⚪ | 🎫 No ticket provided
|
| Codebase Duplication Compliance | |
| ⚪ | Codebase context is not definedFollow the guide to enable codebase context checks. |
| Custom Compliance | |
| 🟢 |
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting CodeObjective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code Status: Passed |
Generic: Secure Error HandlingObjective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while Status: Passed | |
Generic: Secure Logging PracticesObjective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive Status: Passed | |
| ⚪ | Generic: Comprehensive Audit TrailsObjective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis Status: Referred Code
|
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case ManagementObjective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful Status: Referred Code
| |
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data HandlingObjective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent Status: Referred Code
| |
Compliance status legend
🟢 - Fully Compliant🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label
PR Code Suggestions ✨
No code suggestions found for the PR.