Py typing
User description
Motivation and Context
This change improves code maintainability and enhances static type checking by adding type hints to:
- Helps detect potential issues earlier with tools like MyPy and Pyright.
- Improves code readability for contributors and maintainers.
- Aligns with modern Python best practices for type safety.
Files:
- selenium.webdriver.remote.webdriver.py
- selenium.webdriver.remote.webelement.py
- selenium.webdriver.remote.remote_connection.py
- selenium.webdriver.remote.script_key.py
- selenium.webdriver.common.options.py
Types of changes
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
Checklist
- [x] I have read the contributing document.
- [ ] My change requires a change to the documentation.
- [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly.
- [ ] I have added tests to cover my changes.
- [ ] All new and existing tests passed.
PR Type
Enhancement, Bug fix
Description
-
Added type hints across multiple files for improved static type checking.
-
Enhanced code readability and maintainability by aligning with modern Python practices.
-
Fixed potential issues with type safety and compatibility with tools like MyPy and Pyright.
-
Refactored code for better clarity, including breaking long lines and improving formatting.
Changes walkthrough 📝
| Relevant files | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enhancement |
|
Need help?
Type /help how to ...in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.Check out the documentation for more information.
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍
Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
| ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪ |
| 🧪 No relevant tests |
| 🔒 No security concerns identified |
⚡ Recommended focus areas for reviewType Inconsistency
_create_caps function returns a dictionary with capabilities, but in some places like get_remote_connection, the capabilities parameter is used without being created by this function, which could lead to type mismatches. |
PR Code Suggestions ✨
Explore these optional code suggestions:
| Category | Suggestion | Impact |
| Possible issue |
Fix dict modification during iterationThe function modifies the input dictionary while iterating over it, which can py/selenium/webdriver/remote/webdriver.py [406-420]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9__ Why: This suggestion fixes a critical bug where modifying a dictionary while iterating over it could lead to unpredictable behavior or runtime errors. Creating a copy before modification is a proper solution that prevents potential crashes. | High |
Handle invalid options typeThe code doesn't handle the case where py/selenium/webdriver/remote/webdriver.py [260-262]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8__ Why: This suggestion addresses an important error handling gap by adding validation for the options parameter type. Without this check, passing an invalid type would lead to runtime errors without a clear explanation, making debugging difficult. | Medium | |
| General |
Fix Self type annotationUsing py/selenium/webdriver/remote/remote_connection.py [459-467]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7__ Why: This is a valid suggestion that fixes an incorrect type annotation. Using Self as a parameter type is improper - it should only be used as a return type. This correction improves type checking and prevents potential static analysis errors. | Medium |
Fix type checking logicThe equality check should verify that the element is a WebElement before py/selenium/webdriver/remote/webelement.py [574-578]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 2__ Why: The suggestion is technically correct but has minimal impact. The code already checks if the element is a WebElement before proceeding, and the hasattr check is redundant since all WebElement instances will have an id attribute. Removing it simplifies the code slightly but doesn't fix a critical issue. | Low | |
| ||
Can you remove the formatting changes in this that aren't related to the typing changes? There are spurious newlines and unrelated formating changes.
(running the linting tools will re-format it for you)
Can you remove the formatting changes in this that aren't related to the typing changes? There are spurious newlines and unrelated formating changes.
(running the linting tools will re-format it for you)
The formatting changes were automatically applied by the Black linter to ensure the code follows the PEP 8 recommendations.
Which linter should I use to maintain the project's standard formatting, considering it’s a Selenium-related library?
Here's the linters we use:
https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium/blob/030f1f6bd27b99122c5bb57173e47a6390cab99d/py/tox.ini#L64
We use a 120 char line-length with black.
Can you remove the formatting changes in this that aren't related to the typing changes? There are spurious newlines and unrelated formating changes.
(running the linting tools will re-format it for you)
I've made the requested changes and reverted any unrelated formatting modifications. I also ran the project's linter to ensure consistency.
To facilitate the PR review, I reset the previous commits and created new ones using -f to keep the history clean. Let me know if anything else needs adjustment!
Is this still relevant? If so, can you fix the merge conflicts?
Yes, this is still relevant as type annotations are still missing. I've resolved the merge conflicts. Let me know if any further adjustments are needed.
Just a heads up, I think this PR uses conventions not available in old Python (3.8 and/or 3.9), which are supported by Selenium.
An example is that x: str | None must be written as x: Optional[str] or x: Union[str, None] for backwards compatibility with the Python versions supported here.
Thanks for the heads up. We need to be compatible back to 3.9. I just kicked off the CI tests, so we will see if anything fails with 3.9.
Just a heads up, I think this PR uses conventions not available in old Python (3.8 and/or 3.9), which are supported by Selenium.
An example is that
x: str | Nonemust be written asx: Optional[str]orx: Union[str, None]for backwards compatibility with the Python versions supported here.
Thank you for the feedback!
I initially thought that from future import annotations would enable support for the str | None syntax in Python 3.9, but after revisiting the documentation I realized that it's only available from Python 3.10 onward.
I'll update the code to restore compatibility with Python 3.9 by replacing the newer type hint syntax with Optional[...] or Union[...] where needed, and push a new update to this PR shortly.
Thanks again for pointing this out!
There are also quite a few linting failures in this branch. Please run the linters locally and fix any issues when you update your branch. You can run /scripts/format.sh from the main directory in the repo.