Use Capabilities API to set options
User description
Instead of using the importOptions method to duplicate every option, set the individual options directly via the Capabilities API.
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
- Replaced the use of
WebClientOptionswithHtmlUnitDriverOptionsfor setting up the WebDriver. - Set individual options directly via the
HtmlUnitOptioncapabilities API. - Removed the
importOptionsmethod to streamline option setting.
Changes walkthrough 📝
| Relevant files | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhancement |
|
💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment
/helpon the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍
| ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 2 |
| 🧪 Relevant tests | No |
| 🔒 Security concerns | No |
| ⚡ Key issues to review |
Possible Bug: The method getWebClientTimeout() is called twice in the new implementation. Consider storing its result in a variable to avoid multiple calls, which could be inefficient or error-prone if the method's behavior changes.
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨
| Category | Suggestion | Score |
| Possible bug |
Verify that
| 9 |
| Enhancement |
Use direct methods for setting options instead of
| 8 |
| Best practice |
Add exception handling around capability setting to ensure robustnessConsider handling exceptions or errors that might occur during the setting of src/test/java/org/openqa/selenium/htmlunit/WebDriverTestCase.java [548-552]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8Why: Adding exception handling around critical configuration steps is a best practice that enhances the robustness and reliability of the code. | 8 |
| Possible issue |
Verify and correct the import statement for
| 7 |
The codiumai-pr-agent-pro suggestions are all entirely off the mark.
I think you'll notice a pronounced performance improvement by using the Capabilities API instead of copying all of the WebClientOptions properties en masse with the importOptions method.
Thanks, as always
@rbri Absolutely! Were those unit tests running faster with these revisions? Also, do you have a timeline for releasing HtmlUnit 4.4.0 with that hidden element fix?
Were those unit tests running faster with these revisions?
have applied the fix to HtmlUnit itself but no real performance change - for me this is expected, the performance is lost at many other places.
Also, do you have a timeline for releasing HtmlUnit 4.4.0 with that hidden element fix?
not really, usually i make a release every 4 weeks. At the moment i like to wait for the new Edge/Chrome version and i have some strange issues with htmx 2.0 that i like to fix. Made some good progress during the last days but still there are some hard riddles to solve.
But if it helps, i can do a release maybe at the next weekend....