Sean Marshallsay
Sean Marshallsay
Also strings aren't escaped properly when being serialised to JSON, so this AST output ``` $ cat main.f90 program main ! A "comment". print *, "A ""string""." end $ lfortran...
> I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. No need to apologise! Thank you for all the hard work!
Hi @spencerlyon2, sounds like you've already been chatting to @quinnj about this, but just to be clear do you mean something similar to [Postgres' window functions](http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/tutorial-window.html)?
Hmm, I'll see if I can whip up a simple implementation in the next week or two. Then at least we'll have a starting point and we can build on...
I apologise that this has been such a long time coming, other priorities got in the way slightly. I whipped up a very simple implementation last weekend in #70, could...
Just food for thought, what if the safety was baked into the type? E.g. have a `Matrix` type and an `UncheckedMatrix` type. That way the API would be identical across...
Thinking a bit further into it, you could still have the three methods by doing something along the lines of ``` rust impl Checked for Matrix { fn get(...) {...
> Seems like the matrices would not be easy to replace, having different apis. I was actually thinking the opposite, that the two types would have exactly the same API...
Of course. Sorry, I completely missed that (it's been a long week already).
I don't think my contributions really count as creative work, but I'm happy with this if they do.