Decide whether to modify the Mesh printout to group optional connectivities by their source element

[lbdreyer]

Should we modify the new Mesh printout, removing the "optional connectivities" section, and instead place them in their relevent source element section, and add an extra section for boundaries. e.g. something like (taking @pp-mo's example from #4499)

    topology_dimension: 2
    node
        node_dimension: 'nMesh2d_half_levels_node'
        node coordinates
            <AuxCoord: longitude / (degrees)  <lazy>  shape(55298,)>
            <AuxCoord: latitude / (degrees)  <lazy>  shape(55298,)>
    edge
        edge_dimension: 'nMesh2d_half_levels_edge'
        edge_node_connectivity: <Connectivity: Maps every edge/link to two nodes that it connects. / (unknown)  <lazy>  shape(110592, 2)>
        edge coordinates
            <AuxCoord: longitude / (degrees)  <lazy>  shape(110592,)>
            <AuxCoord: latitude / (degrees)  <lazy>  shape(110592,)>
        optional connectivities:
            edge_face_connectivity: <Connectivity: neighbor faces for edges / (unknown)  <lazy>  shape(110592, 2)>
    face
        face_dimension: 'nMesh2d_half_levels_face'
        face_node_connectivity: <Connectivity: Maps every face to its corner nodes. / (unknown)  <lazy>  shape(55296, 4)>
        face coordinates
            <AuxCoord: longitude / (degrees)  <lazy>  shape(55296,)>
            <AuxCoord: latitude / (degrees)  <lazy>  shape(55296,)>
        optional connectivities:
            face_face_connectivity: <Connectivity: Indicates which other faces neighbor each face / (no_unit)  <lazy>  shape(55296, 4)>
            face_edge_connectivity: <Connectivity: Maps every face to its edges. / (unknown)  <lazy>  shape(55296, 4)>
    boundary
        boundary_dimension: 'nMesh2d_half_levels_boundary'
        boundary_node_connectivity: <Connectivity: unknown / (unknown)  <lazy>  shape(1417, 2)>
    long_name: 'Topology data of 2D unstructured mesh'
    var_name: 'Mesh2d_half_levels'

This was an outstanding decision from #4499. See this comment for more details.

[github-actions[bot]]

In order to maintain a backlog of relevant issues, we automatically label them as stale after 500 days of inactivity.

If this issue is still important to you, then please comment on this issue and the stale label will be removed.

Otherwise this issue will be automatically closed in 28 days time.

[github-actions[bot]]

This stale issue has been automatically closed due to a lack of community activity.

If you still care about this issue, then please either:

• Re-open this issue, if you have sufficient permissions, or
• Add a comment stating that this is still relevant and someone will re-open it on your behalf.