NeuralPDE.jl
NeuralPDE.jl copied to clipboard
functional inverse problem
I have an inverse problem where the parameter function is a function of the solution, what is the correct way to implement it?
using ModelingToolkit, NeuralPDE, Lux, Random, NNlib
using Optimization, OptimizationOptimJL, Zygote
import ModelingToolkit: Interval
@parameters x
@variables u(..), b(..)
f(x) = (1+(sin(π*x)^2))/(1+2*(sin(π*x)^2)) * π^2 * sin(π*x) + sin(π*x)
Dxx = Differential(x)^2
eq = [-b(u(x)) * Dxx(u(x)) + u(x) ~ f(x)]
bcs = [u(0) ~ 0, u(1) ~ 0]
domain = [x ∈ Interval(0.0, 1.0)]
@named pdesys = PDESystem(eq, bcs, domain, [x], [u(x), b(u(x))])
# the neural networks
chain_u = Chain(Dense(1, 20, tanh), Dense(20,20, tanh), Dense(20,1))
chain_b = Chain(Dense(1, 20, tanh), Dense(20,20, tanh), Dense(20,1))
x_data = reshape(LinRange(0,1,101)[2:end-1],1,:) |> collect
u_data = sin.(π .* x_data)
function additional_loss(phi, θ, p)
return sum(abs2, phi[1](x_data, θ.depvar.u).-u_data)/length(x_data)
end
dx = 0.01
discretization = NeuralPDE.PhysicsInformedNN([chain_u, chain_b],
NeuralPDE.GridTraining(dx),
additional_loss=additional_loss)
prob = NeuralPDE.discretize(pdesys, discretization)
callback = function (p,l)
println("Current loss is: $l")
return false
end
res = Optimization.solve(prob, BFGS(), callback = callback, maxiters=500)
julia> prob = NeuralPDE.discretize(pdesys, discretization)
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching nameof(::Term{Real, Base.ImmutableDict{DataType, Any}})
Closest candidates are:
nameof(::Sym) at C:\Users\Luffy\.julia\packages\SymbolicUtils\vnuIf\src\types.jl:144
nameof(::ModelingToolkit.AbstractSystem) at C:\Users\Luffy\.julia\packages\ModelingToolkit\tMgaW\src\systems\abstractsystem.jl:139
nameof(::DataType) at C:\Users\Luffy\AppData\Local\Programs\Julia-1.7.2\share\julia\base\reflection.jl:223
...
Stacktrace:
[1] (::NeuralPDE.var"#40#41")(argument::Term{Real, Base.ImmutableDict{DataType, Any}})
@ NeuralPDE .\none:0
[2] iterate
@ .\generator.jl:47 [inlined]
[3] collect(itr::Base.Generator{Vector{Term{Real, Base.ImmutableDict{DataType, Any}}}, NeuralPDE.var"#40#41"})
@ Base .\array.jl:724
[4] get_vars(indvars_::Vector{Num}, depvars_::Vector{Num})
@ NeuralPDE C:\Users\Luffy\.julia\packages\NeuralPDE\iNhvg\src\symbolic_utilities.jl:353
[5] symbolic_discretize(pde_system::PDESystem, discretization::PhysicsInformedNN{GridTraining{Float64}, Nothing, Vector{NeuralPDE.Phi{Chain{NamedTuple{(:layer_1, :layer_2, :layer_3), Tuple{Dense{true, typeof(tanh_fast), typeof(Lux.glorot_uniform), typeof(Lux.zeros32)}, Dense{true, typeof(tanh_fast), typeof(Lux.glorot_uniform), typeof(Lux.zeros32)}, Dense{true, typeof(identity), typeof(Lux.glorot_uniform), typeof(Lux.zeros32)}}}}, NamedTuple{(:layer_1, :layer_2, :layer_3), Tuple{NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}}}}}, typeof(NeuralPDE.numeric_derivative), Bool, typeof(additional_loss), Nothing, Nothing, Base.Pairs{Symbol, Union{}, Tuple{}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}}})
@ NeuralPDE C:\Users\Luffy\.julia\packages\NeuralPDE\iNhvg\src\discretize.jl:420
[6] discretize(pde_system::PDESystem, discretization::PhysicsInformedNN{GridTraining{Float64}, Nothing, Vector{NeuralPDE.Phi{Chain{NamedTuple{(:layer_1, :layer_2, :layer_3), Tuple{Dense{true, typeof(tanh_fast), typeof(Lux.glorot_uniform), typeof(Lux.zeros32)}, Dense{true, typeof(tanh_fast), typeof(Lux.glorot_uniform), typeof(Lux.zeros32)}, Dense{true, typeof(identity), typeof(Lux.glorot_uniform), typeof(Lux.zeros32)}}}}, NamedTuple{(:layer_1, :layer_2, :layer_3), Tuple{NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}}}}}, typeof(NeuralPDE.numeric_derivative), Bool, typeof(additional_loss), Nothing, Nothing, Base.Pairs{Symbol, Union{}, Tuple{}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}}})
@ NeuralPDE C:\Users\Luffy\.julia\packages\NeuralPDE\iNhvg\src\discretize.jl:669
[7] top-level scope
@ REPL[106]:1
[8] top-level scope
@ C:\Users\Luffy\.julia\packages\CUDA\tTK8Y\src\initialization.jl:52
Changing b(u(x))
to b(x)
would work, but that is not how i want it to be
I'm not sure this case will parse. It probably needs a few changes to be supported. I can't think of a quick workaround either, so I'll say this is unsupported right now.
I'm going to post about how the parsing and codegen in this repo should be changed, and that would make it easy to support this, but it won't happen "soon", so I'd just write the PINN out by hand here if you need it. But this is a good thing to target, and the code you posted is probably what the front end should be.
I'll just move on if it's not supported yet.
But yeah, a very good feature to have.