Jack Lord

Either option is feasible but I think this comes down to a decision about what the standard is for: - Is it designed to be a maximalist source of information...

Thanks Steve: Ideally we would require identifiers but the thinking here came from work on loose validation (#45 and #80 ), which was that we would be dealing with a...

I like the sound of the "not solving" solution - but think we can put off a decision on this until we do another translation or release.

Moving comment from @siwhitehouse over from another repo: > I raised this at a round table meeting at Transparency International. > > We discussed the process of entering data on...

Thanks @anderspeders, this is really exciting. I think in schema terms, we can represent LEIs as an additional identifier with GLEI as the `scheme`. In practical terms, that means making...

Thanks @CountCulture, that's a useful clarification - and, yes, I don't see this as having big modelling impacts, it would be more about tooling/infrastructure to support use I think. @anderspeders...

## Proposal Having thought about this a bit more, I would propose the following types: **Legal entities** This would cover legal entities as defined by FATF: > Legal persons refers...

Noting that in the proposal for state-owned enterprises we suggested two other entity types: - `stateEntity` to represent a nation state that ultimately controls an entity; - `stateBody` to represent...

From discussion in #339: > Add the expanded list of entity types: state, stateBody, legalEntity, arrangement, agreement, unknown, anonymous.

The UK PSC Register has a sub-category for LLPs that we can't represent with the current codelist: 1. Decisions * ... 2. Profits * ... * Rights to surplus assets...