Artyom M.

Results 177 comments of Artyom M.

Added tests (it's duplication of the sync version with using ShowAsync). I also used little different approach for IDialogReference for async Instead of ```Csharp IDialogReference dialogReference = null; await comp.InvokeAsync(async...

Hello, Thank you for the PR, however, I've decided to close it. There hasn't been any feedback provided on @just-the-benno's question. While you introduced new extension methods, they haven't been...

This https://github.com/MudBlazor/MudBlazor/pull/3831 should cover the issue above.

Checked, works for me. It sounds like you are using 1.6.x version that was for .net framework instead of 2.0.0 for .net core? Because I don't recall any config to...

No, there is currently no way to do it, because I'm not sure how you want SuperSocket to understand what command it should invoke. What you can try in theory...

I also thought about another way. You can ditch the build in Commands and implement your own IPackageHandler class and tell SuperSocket to use it instead, then you can do...

I guess it would be something like this 1. SuperSocket.Primitives 2. No such thing, the logging is provided via Microsoft.Extensions.Logging 3. SuperSocket.ProtoBase 4. and 5. SuperSocket.WebSocket/SuperSocket.WebSocket.Server You need a deep...

Yes, I'm using in production `SimpleInjector` with `SupeSocket`(2.0). But with a little trick https://docs.simpleinjector.org/en/latest/generichostintegration.html I cross wired the `SimpleInjector` and `Microsoft.DependencyInjection` so in fact I have two dependency injections which...

I do not use TinyMvvm, but i still can create a pull request.

@mikes-gh could the order change because of the css compiler replacement in https://github.com/MudBlazor/MudBlazor/pull/7933? I don't see any other PRs that could affect it.