Michał Sawicz
Michał Sawicz
@luis4a0 sure, I get why it's cleaner this way, but IMO limiting, if you can't "escape" it. If Multipass parses _both_ the `v1` and `v2`, and selects the highest one...
> We _could_ do something like this though: > 1. If v2 Blueprint exists and has image for host architecture, use it. > 2. If not, then check if a...
> There really shouldn't be a need for that. If you want to use an alias, that is what `v1` would be for. I see `v2` as "Here's an image...
ACK on all points. I suppose I just dislike the inevitable duplication, and the alternative of _only_ supporting a{md,rm}64 in a given blueprint (which is what I imagine this split...
Hey @hatched we'll have a look soon - it's not as simple as making it white, since people may have a light menu bar. So it needs to be monochrome,...
Cool, thanks @felixbuenemann! Only yesterday I filed canonical-web-and-design/multipass-design#47, this may make this quite a bit easier :) bors try
Thanks Felix! bors try
Hi @felixbuenemann, I tested the result and it's definitely looking better (see https://github.com/canonical-web-and-design/multipass-design/issues/47#issuecomment-609630437), but there's some love that the icon could receive, especially in low-DPI dark mode. I'll keep this...
Thanks @samlopezic, that's great, and something that will guide us to a fix!