Samuel Trahan (NOAA contractor)

I've merged develop. Those changes were all CICE, so they should not affect this PR's changes nor the bug people are encountering. Hence, I am *not* rerunning regression tests unless...

I've retested my nested global case inside the global-workflow and it has passed the failure point. (I had already tested it outside the workflow.) This triad of fixes still work...

Jet hasn't finished. Did something go wrong over there? I've had lots of little technical issues while running on Jet since the Rocky upgrade.

The cubed-sphere PR has been merged. I updated the FV3 PR to point to the authoritative .gitmodules and cubed sphere. You can proceed to merging the FV3 PR.

I have reverted .gitmodules and pointed FV3 to the head of the authoritative develop branch. This PR is ready for final review and merge.

That PR is still a draft. Our fix is identical (delete the line) so it doesn't matter which one is merged first.

This was actually fixed in an earlier pull request, not 2201. Probably the pull request Dusan points to, two messages ago (https://github.com/NOAA-EMC/fv3atm/pull/803/) but I can't be certain.

It makes sense to put ufs-chem and rrfs-sd I/O in the same file. The rrfs-sd and ufs-chem are the offspring of the same parent. They use some of the same...

This sounds like a misunderstanding of the implementation, not a bug. Some schemes implement their own diagnostic tendencies, and some use the interstitials to determine tendencies. The flag_for_generic_whatever switches which...

Correction: I never tested this scheme, so I don't know if this one works.