Samuel Trahan (NOAA contractor)

@kaiyuan-cheng These changes need to be on top of dev/emc for them to be in RRFS or UFS. Can you please open a PR to that branch?

@kaiyuan-cheng The changes actually fail to compile in UFS, so I can't even test them. Also, this leaves me wondering if some of the bugs I'm seeing originate from differences...

I'm uncertain of what to do with this difference between the files (`-` lines are dev/emc, and `+` lines are your branch) but they do relate to indexing. ``` @@...

I also see this difference, and I don't know what to make of it. Again, `-` lines are dev/emc, and `+` lines are your branch: ``` - call mappm(km, pe0,...

I tried applying *just* the four lines you changed, to dev/emc, and the code fails here in fv_diagnostics.F90 with a "floating-point exception:" *Edit*: It fails in debug mode (-DDEBUG=ON at...

I can run the global static nest configuration with both my modified global-workflow and the HAFS workflow. I haven't tried a globe without a nest. EDIT: Those are both atmosphere-only...

Here are the relevant lines of @zhanglikate's log file. EDIT: Here is just the error message: ``` 4608: Abort(470417410) on node 4608 (rank 4608 in comm 0): Fatal error in...

My successful runs use an older version of the scripts, but they do use the latest code.

> @SamuelTrahanNOAA are you running the C768 global in your global static nest configuration case? I've run the C96, C192, and C384 with the latest version of my workflow. In...

I'm able to run with this version of the code: - https://github.com/ufs-community/ufs-weather-model/pull/2201 My test is a C768 resolution globe rotated and stretched, with a nest added inside one global tile....