Salanto
Salanto
> good idea but it's "might" have bugs in future. Any change is bound to run the risk of introducing new issues. The point you make is invalid.
This is the issue here. Honestly, at this point, we might need a copyright lawyer to do this properly. In prior precedence cases it was agreed that the GPL license...
I think, for the sake of community contributions, we should carve an exception in the GPL for any commit prior to this one? That is for Omni to decide tho.
Gonna leave this open for a while to ensure people have the opportunity to give their final thoughts, but currently it seems the MIT is being invalidated.
> > Don't make things complicated, just cover it with (only) normal GPLv3 and be done with it. > > We have a legal obligation to respect the copyright holders...
Would a notice in the readme work? Point people to the last MIT commit and we are good?