Kristina
Kristina
labelling 1.1 assuming this can be added in a backward compatible way after 1.0
@c2bo can this be closed like as suggested above?
I understand that it might sound redundant, but we actually added this note, because implementer asked for this clarification, and I am inclined to keep it..? cc @paulbastian
will close in a week, unless strong objections
this probably supersedes/relates to #19 ?
definition of `credential_offer_endpoint` parameter in [section 3.2](https://openid.github.io/OpenID4VCI/openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-wg-draft.html#section-3.2-4.3) should probably point to [section 4.1](https://openid.github.io/OpenID4VCI/openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-wg-draft.html#name-credential-offer) and not section 11.1. `credential_offer_endpoint` is not only for POST, but > The Credential Issuer sends Credential...
see thumbs up from the author on the clarification comment. closing in a week, unless objections
the intention here was - when a Pre-Authorized Code Flow through anonymous access to the token endpoint was used, MUST omit - anything else, optional for wallet and issuer so,...
@awoie would you be able to add this as part of #356 ?
Could you please do a PR on this?