Kristina

wg discussion - come back to it after we redesign signed issuer metadata: sign entire metadata or do not sign anything. and prevent signing only part of the metadata. -...

we wanted parity with original credential format identifiers `jwt_vc` and `ldp_vc`, where the structure was `_`. in the case of mdocs, MSO is the issuer-signed part and mdoc was the...

but this comment made me think if `vc+sd-jwt` format identifier we took from the media type that sd-jwt vc spec registers is consistent with the rest. maybe its not and...

I don't think there is `right semantic` here. I would be pretty opposed having `_cbor` in the format name. and because every single format identifier seems to have "how it...

let us know if there are still concerns, otherwise would close in a week.

discussed during the WG call - discussed to add a short text on naming guidance for new formats. general guidance to use media types (like for vcdm 2.0 probably #194)...

I am not sure I agree with the proposed change. We are not moving appendix E because it is contentful but because it is what we want to read the...

there does not seem to be clear rule. in IETF, notices are in the beginning, in OIDC, they are in the appendix. acknowledgements do seem to be the last. happy...

@peppelinux are you asking for an explicit text that Credential response cannot be a nested JWT because entire response is encrypted and signed credentials are contained as claims in the...

Do we need a whole section in VCI on how to encrypt credential response without signing the whole payload again? something like only encrypted JARM in VP? https://openid.github.io/OpenID4VP/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-wg-draft.html#section-8.3-2 cc @bc-pi