Kristina

we might come back and add security considerations. closing for now

> Does this mean that the Issuer is obliged to accept such requests (same type but different public keys for example) with the same Access Token? > > Yes, unless...

@paulbastian i think that last comment is more relevant to #331 ?

@andprian has the question been answered? is there any specific clarification you would like to see in the specification..? pending-close unless hear back in a week

It's a suggestion to improve interoperability among the companies that have already implemented the current specification text, of which there are quite a few, and which are part of the...

I think we should have the discussion about what we want to prioritize: having a cleanest solution possible, or having a solution that builds up on what has already been...

@awoie Mattr has implementation of VCI in production. You are preferring a larger breaking change from what you have?

agreed to come back to this after agreeing on the new query language design first, since there is an overlap with the new query language (#266) how to clarify how...

in-person WG mtg: - problem statement sounds reasonable - next steps are to discuss requirements and specific mechanisms - need to discuss if push from issuer to the wallet works...

please indicate in the issue if you are interested in implementing a mechanism like this.