Support matching ip interface id for ip_cidr rule

[blip]

Added support for matching IPv6's interface id, using a syntax like ::1/::ff in ip_cidr and source_ip_cidr.

Fix #2204

cc @dyhkwong

[dyhkwong]

I don't merge PR but here is my thoughts:

• This is only a syntactic sugar of existing functionality.

• CIDR is also used elsewhere, e.g. tun.address, tun.route_address and tun.route_exclude_address.

• This may require a version bump of ruleset. There is already a pending one https://github.com/SagerNet/sing-geosite/commit/9f8a5e7cba4f10cbb65ea2ba2ce81201bdb0595a.

[blip]

Not sure i quite understand

This is only a syntactic sugar of existing functionality.

Maybe I missed something, but how can an interface id currently be matched without this PR?

CIDR is also used elsewhere, e.g. tun.address, tun.route_address and tun.route_exclude_address.

These are not matching rules? Are you suggesting they should also support the ::1/:ff syntax? But this syntax is not a valid address.

[dyhkwong]

Maybe I missed something, but how can an interface id currently be matched without this PR?

So this is in fact something like SagerNet/sing-box#2014?

[blip]

yep, that person was asking the same feature. But it's not really syntactic sugar if it's not already achievable with the current rules, imho.

[dyhkwong]

Maybe this should be a new type of rule. And the author of #2014 mentioned that this is also for tun.route_address_set?