Sergey Vilgelm

yes, but the implementation is simpler

we already had this discussion and decided that the message will be changed in v2

I still don't see a way how can we replace the fork with an upstream repo. The main repo does not provide the public methods, it cannot be used as...

@mvdan what is the stats on implementing the Analyzer? It would really helps me in my project of [custom linter](https://github.com/sv-tools/gochecker)

@mvdan I have created a simple wrapper to provide an analyzer with suggested fixes, if you are interesting, I can contribute it to this project https://github.com/sv-tools/gochecker/blob/main/analyzers/gofumpt/analyzer.go

Sorry, this is not my action. I just was lucky to known the answer. I'm not sure I can help you, didn't touch the actions for a year or so....

@amarjeetanandsingh The PR you created fixes the only issue with writing the headers, but what will happen if another thread is reading those headers at same time? In my opinion,...

has been merged in #715, can be closed

no changes in two years. close it

I also faced this issue with `[][]string`: ```go type Query struct { Filter map[string]interface{} `json:"filter" optional:"true" description:"..."` GroupBy [][]string `json:"group_by" optional:"true" description:"...` Sort []SortField `json:"sort" optional:"true" description:"..."` } ``` it...