STEllAR-GROUP
Align our parallel range implementation with P3179
Hi @hkaiser, hope you're doing well. I wanted to ask if this issue will be taken up as a GSoC project later on or if it is open for us to work on as a precursor to GSoC. Thanks a lot for the clarification.
Hi @hkaiser, hope you're doing well. I wanted to ask if this issue will be taken up as a GSoC project later on or if it is open for us to work on as a precursor to GSoC. Thanks a lot for the clarification.
This issue possibly involves a lot of work, thus it may not be possible to be addressed by a sole GSoC project. Please feel free to start looking into this, if you like ;-)
Sure, I'd like to start looking at this. I was going through the parallel range algorithm paper. To clarify, our goal is to align all the places we use C++ ranges with adding parallel algorithms, right? Thanks for the help!
Sure, I'd like to start looking at this. I was going through the parallel range algorithm paper. To clarify, our goal is to align all the places we use C++ ranges with adding parallel algorithms, right? Thanks for the help!
We already do have parallel range-based algorithms (of our own design). We should make sure that our interfaces conform to what is being proposed for standardization.
Understood. Thanks! I'll start reading this.
Just FWIW, our range based parallel algorithms are here: https://github.com/STEllAR-GROUP/hpx/tree/master/libs/core/algorithms/include/hpx/parallel/container_algorithms
thanks for pointing out the resource for range-based parallel algorithms.
Hi @hkaiser, I am new to HPX and open-source and would like to contribute longer-term. Is this issue something to which I can contribute?
