resolve CI test breaking gasnet issues

[ct-clmsn]

Fixes #6385

Proposed Changes

• modify builders to use gasnet-mpi
• modify the hpxrun script to use mpiexec when testing gasnet-mpi
• update the gasnet environment logic to enable or disable gasnet

Any background context you want to provide?

the gasnet parcelport was merged into hpx and had started causing other parcelport tests to silently fail

Checklist

Not all points below apply to all pull requests.

• [x] I have added a new feature and have added tests to go along with it.
• [x] I have fixed a bug and have added a regression test.

[codacy-production[bot]]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
+0.07%	∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (5ffdfbe2a1b1b561adccad301ae3fd0140acfe0b)	193075	164320	85.11%
Head commit (8877fede07000e1b803e1930ed8bf5190c948451)	190055 (-3020)	161877 (-2443)	85.17% (+0.07%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#6386)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

[Pansysk75]

retest lsu

[Pansysk75]

retest

[hkaiser]

@Pansysk75, @ct-clmsn: what is the state of this PR? Did we ever manage to get the gasnet parcelport working properly?

[ct-clmsn]

@hkaiser I've had issues accessing the execution logs when the application fails runtime checks. I'll be pushing to complete this on a separate cluster at the top of the week.

[hkaiser]

@hkaiser I've had issues accessing the execution logs when the application fails runtime checks. I'll be pushing to complete this on a separate cluster at the top of the week.

Yes, the CSCS CDash is a bit unreliable, currently. We're in the process of moving it to Rostam.

[codacy-production[bot]]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.44%	:white_check_mark: ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (5ffdfbe2a1b1b561adccad301ae3fd0140acfe0b)	0	0	84.57%
Head commit (b5694fcac43dd29b99b7a37c0b4815ddf562acc2)	189565 (+189565)	161149 (+161149)	85.01% (+0.44%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#6386)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation}

[hkaiser]

@ct-clmsn could you please rebase this onto master? This will give us an understanding of what works (and what doesn't). Thanks!

[ct-clmsn]

@hkaiser will do; currently working with @constracktor on debugging this branch

[hkaiser]

@hkaiser will do; currently working with @constracktor on debugging this branch

Thanks. I'll leave this PR for now on track for the upcomming V1.10.0 release.