HVScrollView icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
HVScrollView copied to clipboard

大scrollView默认是添加第一个controller,如果想进去就是选中第二个或者第三个,左右滚动有bug

Open CH305426 opened this issue 6 years ago • 0 comments

CH305426 avatar Mar 16 '18 01:03 CH305426

Not at the moment, but I will considering it. If you have a use-case that requires MIT I'm certainly open to hearing it :)

adamstark avatar Nov 17 '18 09:11 adamstark

I have an iOS app that needs wav file support. Don’t want to oss it for obvious reasons :-) Don’t worry if it’s a hassle I’m sure other wave file libs out there.

On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 at 09:46, Adam Stark [email protected] wrote:

Not at the moment, but I will considering it. If you have a use-case that requires MIT I'm certainly open to hearing it :)

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/adamstark/AudioFile/issues/10#issuecomment-439604253, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAADNFoMHxR02gUqSrE-PLCQ1UE_nHHkks5uv9rngaJpZM4YmeJc .

weepy avatar Nov 17 '18 10:11 weepy

Hi @adamstark,

great library! Just wanted to check this old thread if you are still considering changing to MIT? It's not possible to use this library in any closed-source application since GPL infects the whole project.

Johannes

johanneskares avatar May 20 '21 13:05 johanneskares

Hi,

How about using LGPL v2.1 instead of GPLv3 ? it allows you to keep the project open source (and must still be open source if modified) however you can still link against it as long as it's dynamically linked and can be quite literally replaced via a copy-paste

I've linked here an TL;DR on what it does: https://tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-lesser-general-public-license-v2.1-(lgpl-2.1)

mempler avatar Jan 06 '22 14:01 mempler

I think actually that's also the case with GPLv3 (you can link against if the source isn't changeD).

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 3:22 PM Robin @.***> wrote:

Hi,

How about using LGPL instead of GPLv3 ? it allows you to keep the source open source (and must still be open source if modified) however you can still link against it as long as it's dynamically linked and can be quite literally replaced via a copy-paste

I've linked here an TL;DR on what it does:

https://tldrlegal.com/license/gnu-lesser-general-public-license-v2.1-(lgpl-2.1)

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/adamstark/AudioFile/issues/10#issuecomment-1006628799, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAAGNGWJLAEWT3L2AD6WILUUWQQRANCNFSM4GEZ4JOA . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.

You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

weepy avatar Jan 06 '22 15:01 weepy

Hi all, I have been re-considering my use of GPLv3 for a while now. This library would be top of my list for giving a more permissive licence. I'm not totally sure how it works with changing a library licence when people have already contributed to it. By default their contributions are provided under the licence of the repository, so I think i need to confirm with them first...

@mynameisjohn @Sidelobe @MatthieuHernandez @Abhinav1997 @helloimmatt @BenjaminHinchliff @emiro85

Do you approve of moving this repository (AudioFile) and therefore your contributions to a MIT licence?

Thanks, Adam

adamstark avatar Jan 06 '22 15:01 adamstark

If I could ask you each to comment here rather than just adding a reaction so it is a bit clearer that would be great :)

adamstark avatar Jan 06 '22 15:01 adamstark

I’m fine with it.

Abhinav1997 avatar Jan 06 '22 15:01 Abhinav1997

I'm good with whatever you decide - thank you for the great work

BenjaminHinchliff avatar Jan 06 '22 20:01 BenjaminHinchliff

Fine for me as well.

emiro85 avatar Jan 06 '22 20:01 emiro85

Absolutely fine with me switching over to MIT license 👌

Sidelobe avatar Jan 06 '22 20:01 Sidelobe

Fine with me too - thanks for checking.

mynameisjohn avatar Jan 06 '22 21:01 mynameisjohn

All good go for it. Thanks for checking with me as well :)

helloimmatt avatar Jan 07 '22 19:01 helloimmatt

@MatthieuHernandez - any thoughts? :)

adamstark avatar Jan 13 '22 16:01 adamstark

I'm still wondering what I'm doing here 😆 but yes I totally agree with that. Sorry for my late reply.

MatthieuHernandez avatar Jan 14 '22 14:01 MatthieuHernandez

Thanks @MatthieuHernandez - you are listed in the collaborator list for the repo. I wasn't totally sure how as I didn't see a commit but assumed it was a contribution somewhere or a contribution to a contribution? Either way, thanks for confirming!

Thanks to everyone else for confirming too - I'll get to this in the next few days

Adam

adamstark avatar Jan 14 '22 14:01 adamstark

@adamstark I just checked and it turns out I reviewed and approved a pull request 2 years ago.

MatthieuHernandez avatar Jan 14 '22 15:01 MatthieuHernandez

Yes, that sounds right - I knew it was something like that :) Thank you!

adamstark avatar Jan 14 '22 15:01 adamstark

It's done! AudioFile is now licensed under the MIT licence :)

Thanks all.

adamstark avatar Jan 15 '22 17:01 adamstark

If anyone is interested, I wrote a little about my thinking behind doing this (as well as lots of people asking me to, of course): https://twitter.com/mostlynoise/status/1482417156033814532

adamstark avatar Jan 15 '22 18:01 adamstark