seed
seed copied to clipboard
SEED-platform
Provide method for repeating analyses
"This is basically an ""analysis template"". Question is: do we only store the analysis configuration, or do we also store the properties used in the analysis? I think we might want to do the former, and provide some additional way of repeating specific analyses that have been previously run
Possible use case: As a user, I would like to be able to run an analysis on a property multiple times and compare the results, so that I can assess how <successful an EEM was, ???>
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
![github-actions[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
This is a large and not well defined effort which we won't be able to tackle for a while. Closing for now.
@macintoshpie -- I don't think we should close this issue. This is something I keep wanting every time I use the analysis feature.
Can we put it at a low priority or add an Ice Box label to it, but not close it?
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been closed automatically. If this still affects you please re-open this issue with a comment or contact us so we can look into resolving it.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been in the icebox for over 180 days and has been closed automatically. If this still affects you please re-open this issue with a comment or contact us so we can look into resolving it.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.