seed
seed copied to clipboard
Document BETTER meter limitations
context
BETTER analysis uses meter data provided by SEED
problem
- it seems like we don't get good results from BETTER even though we provide what we think is sufficient data.
task
- document what meter data is and isn't used by BETTER
It's been mentioned before that maybe BETTER only recognizes the last year or two of data, need to test this as well.
@macintoshpie -- from the anonymized data from JCC, I have figured out which properties get good results and which don't. I have made a separate spreadsheet of all the properties that get N/A for at least one of the fuel types.
I will go over that with Han on the BETTER team and see if he can provide some clues as to the results, which it would be nice to pass along to the SEED user if possible.
Related to #2822
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
I think we need to resolve this, so took the "stale" label off
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
@RDmitchell What is the status of this ticket? I believe the ticket task is to document the problem... Is it already documented or does the issue need to be verified again? Thanks
@isalanglois -- I think I need to understand this a bit more, which probably means talking to the BETTER team. Based on that we can decide if it something that SEED needs to deal with or whether I should just document it.
I have added a documentation tag and added status To Do. I will try to get to this soon.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity within 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.