Simon Boudrias

@LitoMore want to send a PR to do this now? In the documention, it's fine to target new Node; especially in recipes!

Oh, I don't mean we should bump require v16 today. I meant that the recipes can refer to `timers/promises` even if it won't work for Node 14 users.

Happy to review a PR adding this to `@inquirer/prompts` through a `theme` flag. Might want to not make it a boolean, and favour passing in a string representing the behavior;...

PR #1381 is up with this feature. I'll leave open a few days for review and feedback. Feel free to chip in!

Closing this ticket as stale. Open new issues if you encounter problem with the [new Inquirer API](https://github.com/SBoudrias/Inquirer.js/issues/293#1214). The new API expose a documented `cancel` method to stop a readline. And...

Hey @mokkabonna, yes that'd be the ideal. One thing to note is that afterward your custom prompt will be usable standalone (which I think overall is better.) But it won't...

I'll mark this one as complete since the new package is out and in typescript https://github.com/SBoudrias/Inquirer.js/discussions/1214

PR to fix this is welcomed, the code itself is pretty short https://github.com/SBoudrias/Inquirer.js/pull/663 `number` as a prompt was removed from the latest version (`@inquirer/prompts`) due to the bad UX it...

> Can you guys add an option to use BOTH module systems? Like I posted, this is tracked in #1159. I'd be happy to review a PR and facilitate a...

Hey, this is coming from an old version of Inquirer. Would you mind updating to latest #1214; it's very likely to fix this problem, and you'll have a much smaller...