Roman Iakovlev

I've just released Timeshape version 2024a.23 with protobuf 3.25.5. Thanks @AeroSecGeek for your contribution!

@AeroSecGeek yes, you're absolutely right, I've overlooked it. This means, a new release of Timeshape will be needed as well, because it's going to depend on a new build of...

Ok it's done properly now, Timeshape 2024a.24 is released with geojson-proto 1.1.4 (which has upgraded protobuf).

I understand the importance of this upgrade, but I'm currently unable to spend enough time on this. If someone sends a PR, I'll gladly merge it and cut a release....

> Curious: why sbt? Seems like reverting to Maven would encourage more contributions. Agree, if I were making this choice nowadays I'd go with Maven. I'm open to switching to...

@internetstaff Thanks for the PR and the ping, I'me missed the PR notification somehow. I'll take a look!

@internetstaff I've merged your PR, but there seems to be a problem with publishing to Maven Central. It's the first time I try to publish after migrating to Maven from...

Regrading geojson-proto being a snapshot, this is by design (from the sbt times) but is probably going to change in the future. I wouldn't be too concerned about it, because...

Oh I see, the current main Timeshape release refers to the `SNAPSHOT` version of `geojson-proto`. This is definitely unexpected and wrong, it should refer to a stable version. The release...

I think there's another way. Looking at this new Sonatype Central publishing plugin, it seems there's a [setting](https://central.sonatype.org/publish/publish-portal-maven/#ignorepublishedcomponents) to not re-publish the existing artifacts. If it works as advertised, we...