Roman Hotsiy

@webark can you try this: https://github.com/Redocly/redoc/issues/1575#issuecomment-887461961 Also, you may need to add ``` resolve: { fallback: { "fs": false, "path": require.resolve("path-browserify") } } ```

Hey @jmendiara. This PR looks really great 👍 I will review it carefully early next week though. Sorry for the delay.

You're doing nothing wrong. ReDoc just doesn't support your use case yet.

@Luo-Yuwen I think you confused this project with redoc-cli here: https://github.com/Redocly/redoc I moved the issue.

Hey @lornajane! Thanks for the issue! We are all in to make Redoc v2 more accessible! > Would it help to have separate issues for the different occurrences? I don't...

Let's use this issue as umbrella for all the further issues. Just edit your initial comment.

@adamaltman, note this is a tracking issue. We will add more items here when discovered. But all the current ones are fixed already on version `2.0.0-rc.35`. @lornajane would be great...

Hey @lornajane, we've fixed all the newly reported issues. Could you check this out again and provide any extra feedback? Thanks!

You can use our demo page https://redocly.github.io/redoc/ or use TL;DR section from the README and replace spec-url with your definition URL: https://github.com/Redocly/redoc#tldr. Use 2.0.0-rc.36. Also, the latest redoc-cli should be...

Hey @seeebiii! This looks fantastic! We were planning to create our "official" GitHub Action as part of this repo (under @redocly organization). Would you be interested in contributing?