Roestlab
Plot Interface Refactoring
Refactor plotting documentation for easier interaction with python interface/jupyter notebook interface. I am not too sure which strategy would be best.
Some ideas:
Remove the config interface and directly take in parameters on initiation.
plotting methods directly built into structs?
I kind of like the config interface to avoid having too many parameters in the method call, unless we use **kwargs to pass parameters directly to the plotting (bokeh figure/ plotly figure) interfaces (which may be limited).
I like the idea of having the plotting methods also directly part of the structs.
I don't mind the config its just don't really like how some parameters are not relevant for certain plots. Maybe the plot config should be directly parameters of the respective plotters? not a general thing? I am not sure will have to think about it more
Some refactoring was done in the https://github.com/Roestlab/massdash/pull/106 More refactoring might need to be done?