feat: Move enhanced navigation out of feature preview
Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)
Issue(s)
Steps to test or reproduce
Further comments
Looks like this PR is not ready to merge, because of the following issues:
- This PR is missing the 'stat: QA assured' label
Please fix the issues and try again
If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines
⚠️ No Changeset found
Latest commit: 245049a8ac9224afaceb98e95ab6153b2b303d1c
Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.
This PR includes no changesets
When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types
Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.
Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR
[!IMPORTANT]
Review skipped
Draft detected.
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the
.coderabbit.yamlfile in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the@coderabbitai reviewcommand.You can disable this status message by setting the
reviews.review_statustofalsein the CodeRabbit configuration file.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
- [ ] Create PR with unit tests
- [ ] Post copyable unit tests in a comment
- [ ] Commit unit tests in branch
feat/promote-newNavigation
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.
Codecov Report
:x: Patch coverage is 90.38462% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
:white_check_mark: Project coverage is 72.14%. Comparing base (3c42f0d) to head (0622b2c).
:warning: Report is 401 commits behind head on release-8.0.0.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-8.0.0 #37285 +/- ##
=================================================
+ Coverage 66.43% 72.14% +5.70%
=================================================
Files 3276 1454 -1822
Lines 109596 75926 -33670
Branches 20860 10822 -10038
=================================================
- Hits 72814 54776 -18038
+ Misses 34116 20736 -13380
+ Partials 2666 414 -2252
| Flag | Coverage Δ | |
|---|---|---|
| e2e | ? |
|
| e2e-api | ? |
|
| unit | 72.14% <90.38%> (+0.57%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:
- :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
- :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
Are you seriously going to foist this junk on everyone?
Amongst others..... This is seriously poor and not prime time.
https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/issues/36727
Hello @reetp have you considered change your tone? I've been seen you all the time so mad with the community, I don't think this is the spirit of the thing. We're all professionals here mate, we appreciate kind and respect. I already answered you in the issue you attached.
Hello @reetp have you considered change your tone? I've been seen you all the time so mad with the community, I don't think this is the spirit of the thing.
Nope. If it's junk, it's junk.
I've probably done more work in the community here than anyone. Check my record over 9 years. I'm critical if criticism is required.
What I can't stand is an ostrich mentality.
We're all professionals here mate, we appreciate kind and respect.
Respect goes two ways.
Get over it & start listening. That's what professionals do. Accept they've made mistakes. When my staff tell me I've made a mistake I have to listen.
I've raised criticisms & effectively been told "it's great, you'll get used to it & love it". Very Gnome.
I've told you why it's a bad piece of design. And I won't be using it.
https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat/issues/33561#issuecomment-3486778007
Let me tell you something John, as soon as you raised your concern here, I get into all your comments regarding this feature and detailed it to share with the product team, who makes such decision. I stand there trying to make community being heard, but it seems who doesn't listens is you.
If you've been around for 9 years, you should already know that, although engineers are the ones who raise pull requests, they aren't the ones who make the major product decisions.
I agree with you in a lot of points but in the end, I'm payed to make my work and accept that sometimes is not up to me. The only thing I'm asking you, is to be polite with who dedicate time to listen and talk to you in this open community, because there are others that don't give a shit, so try to be patient as we are with you.
📦 Docker Image Size Report
📈 Changes 
| Service | Current | Baseline | Change | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sum of all images | 1.1GiB | 1.1GiB | +9.2MiB | |
| rocketchat | 357MiB | 347MiB | +9.5MiB | |
| omnichannel-transcript-service | 132MiB | 132MiB | -90KiB | |
| queue-worker-service | 132MiB | 132MiB | -92KiB | |
| ddp-streamer-service | 126MiB | 126MiB | -39KiB | |
| account-service | 113MiB | 113MiB | -37KiB | |
| presence-service | 111MiB | 111MiB | -38KiB | |
| authorization-service | 111MiB | 111MiB | -39KiB |
📊 Historical Trend
---
config:
theme: "dark"
xyChart:
width: 900
height: 400
---
xychart
title "Image Size Evolution by Service (Last 30 Days + This PR)"
x-axis ["11/15 22:28", "11/16 01:28", "11/17 23:50", "11/18 22:53", "11/19 23:02", "11/21 16:49", "11/24 17:34", "11/27 22:32", "11/28 19:05", "12/01 23:01", "12/02 21:57", "12/03 21:00", "12/04 18:17", "12/05 21:56", "12/08 20:15", "12/09 22:17", "12/10 23:26", "12/11 21:56", "12/12 17:30", "12/12 20:53 (PR)"]
y-axis "Size (GB)" 0 --> 0.5
line "account-service" [0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11]
line "authorization-service" [0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11]
line "ddp-streamer-service" [0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12, 0.12]
line "omnichannel-transcript-service" [0.14, 0.14, 0.14, 0.14, 0.14, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13]
line "presence-service" [0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11, 0.11]
line "queue-worker-service" [0.14, 0.14, 0.14, 0.14, 0.14, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13, 0.13]
line "rocketchat" [0.36, 0.36, 0.35, 0.35, 0.35, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.35]
Statistics (last 19 days):
- 📊 Average: 1.5GiB
- ⬇️ Minimum: 1.2GiB
- ⬆️ Maximum: 1.6GiB
- 🎯 Current PR: 1.1GiB
ℹ️ About this report
This report compares Docker image sizes from this build against the develop baseline.
-
Tag:
pr-37285 -
Baseline:
develop - Timestamp: 2025-12-12 20:53:00 UTC
- Historical data points: 19
Updated: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:53:01 GMT