Robin Thomas
Robin Thomas
> [!NOTE] > This proposal is part of a series of proposals focusing on accessibility around vehicle types. It is motivated by the development of a [NeTEx based vehicle registry](https://3.basecamp.com/3256016/buckets/2570434/messages/8258678277)...
Currently only facilities can be assigned to a `VehicleType` (via `VehicleType/facilities`) but not equipment. Equipment requires a `DeckPlan` element (`EquipableSpace`) or `Vehicle` that references it (via `actualVehicleEquipments`). In our opinion...
> [!NOTE] > This proposal is part of a series of proposals focusing on accessibility around vehicle types. It is motivated by the development of a [NeTEx based vehicle registry](https://3.basecamp.com/3256016/buckets/2570434/messages/8258678277)...
`TransportType` is declared abstract in Transmodel. As far as I understand it acts as a base type for `VehicleType`, `Train` etc. Also something like `ref="TransportType"` does not exist anywhere in...
Partially resolves: #702 > xsd/netex_framework/netex_reusableComponents/netex_deckPlan_version.xsd > As a DeckEntrance can be referred to from two DeckSpaces I think it should be possible to (also) define them (but not refer them)...
Resolves #873 In general the proposal follows the idea of place equipments like `LiftEquipment` or `RampEquipment` which all derive from an abstract `AccessEquipment`. This slightly deviates from the original proposal...
I noticed that `EquipmentRef` can be assigned to `WheelchairVehicleEquipment` and `AccessVehicleEquipment`. This seemed wrong to me. My guess is that the `ActualVehicleEquipmentGroup` shouldn't be part of them. Currently things like...
Resolves #882
Resolves #900 This slightly deviates from the original proposal in the following ways: - Add `StepHeight` to `AccessVehicleEquipment` (required by [German handbook of accessible travel chains](https://www.delfi.de/media/delfi_handbuch_barrierefreie_reiseketten_2._auflage_2024.pdf) - see code 3111)...