Non-free license agreement

[effigies]

There may be issues with regard to automatically installing FSL and other non-free software without displaying (and perhaps prompting for acknowledgment?) of the license agreement.

I acknowledge that it's in the docs, but programmatic installation of software may require more active measures.

[kaczmarj]

Good point. Do you know how neurodebian handles that? As far as I know, users aren’t prompted about the non-free license agreements. Though, they do have to actively use the non-free apt sources.

On Jun 15, 2018, at 3:08 AM, Chris Markiewicz [email protected] wrote:

There may be issues with regard to automatically installing FSL and other non-free software without displaying (and perhaps prompting for acknowledgment?) of the license agreement.

I acknowledge that it's in the docs, but programmatic installation of software may require more active measures.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[kaczmarj]

I do take care to alert the user that FSL is non-free, when they enter a container with fsl installed through neurodocker (not neurodebian).

https://github.com/kaczmarj/neurodocker/blob/70748f5009dc9fcf74de6a7f2606e45620ace16e/neurodocker/templates/fsl.yaml#L30-L32

[djarecka]

i think this is coverage indifferent issues