Víctor Rebollo Pérez
Víctor Rebollo Pérez
### 22/05/2023 **Build**: https://ci.wazuh.info/job/Test_integration_launcher/139/
### 23/05/2023 The following tests fail after changes: - `test_gcloud/test_functionality/test_rules.py::test_rules[get_configuration0]` -> This failure is not related with the changes: https://ci.wazuh.info/job/Test_integration/39161/console (Test pass in the second iteration) - `test_agentd/test_agentd_parametrized_reconnections` *** It...
### 26/06/2023 - Changes base branch to 4.4.5 - Resolved conflicts - Fix minor errors in library changes - Fix pep8 in changed files Currently testing changes
### 27/06/2023 - Fix error in integratord module - Testing all the suite: https://ci.wazuh.info/job/Test_integration_launcher/157/
### 28/06/2023 - https://ci.wazuh.info/job/Test_integration/40629/ - All suite: https://ci.wazuh.info/job/Test_integration_launcher/158/ - :red_circle: **Syscollector**: Expected https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh-qa/issues/4230 - :red_circle: **Vulnerability Detector**: Expected https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh-qa/issues/4231
> In both tests, https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh-qa/pull/3972#issuecomment-1437411031 and https://github.com/wazuh/wazuh-qa/pull/3972#issuecomment-1437407921 I can see an error before the collection (it seems to appear only in the integration tests when there are deselected tests), do...
Regarding these comments: > Why are you modifying a test? Isn't it out of scope? I acknowledge that I could have done a better job in clearly exposing the problem....
Is necessary to determinate in which CI process VD tests will be included. Further details from management team are required.
The issue has been replicated enabling modulesd debug. This has been carried on this build: https://ci.wazuh.info/job/Test_e2e_system/256/ - **[Report](https://ci.wazuh.info/job/Test_e2e_system/256/artifact/256/Test_e2e_system_256_test_vulnerability_detector.zip)**
At present, attempts to manually replicate the issue have been unsuccessful. We've been unable to reproduce the reported issue in a single manager node local environment. Further research is needed...