submissions
submissions copied to clipboard
ReScience
[Re] Exploration in Model-based Reinforcement Learning by Empirically Estimating Learning Progress
Original article: Lopes, M., Lang, T., Toussaint, M., & Oudeyer, P. Y. (2012). Exploration in model-based reinforcement learning by empirically estimating learning progress. Advances in neural information processing systems, 25.
PDF URL: https://github.com/AugustinChrtn/Reproduction/blob/master/article.pdf Metadata URL: https://github.com/AugustinChrtn/Reproduction/blob/master/metadata.yaml Code URL: https://github.com/AugustinChrtn/Reproduction/
Scientific domain: Computational Neuroscience Programming language: Python Suggested editor:
Thank you for your submission. An editor will be soon assigned. @benoit-girard Can you handle this submission (either editing it or assigning an editor)?
Thank you for your answer! @benoit-girard is my PhD supervisor and cannot edit this submission due to conflict of interest.
Oh sorry, I didn't check the authors... @oliviaguest Can you handle this submission (either editing it or assigning an editor)?
👋 Hi @hhihn @kkhetarpal @ghost-nn-machine @MA-Ramirez can any/all of you review this for ReScience C? 😊 Please let me know as soon as possible if you can take this on, I would appreciate that of course, but also be aware I might be harder to reach than usual till next week. Thank you!
Dear editors, Dear @rougier, Dear @oliviaguest, Any news from the reviewing process? I wish you all a great summer! Best regards mehdi
Hi @MehdiKhamassi I guess August is not the best month to find reviewers. Let's hope we'll find them early September. @oliviaguest Any progress on that?
Sorry indeed. It's so slow-going. As you see, nobody even replied above; I'll keep trying. If you have any suggestions, please give them to us. 😊
Dear all,
thank you very much for the invitation to review the article. Nonetheless, this time I won’t be able to review it due to time constraints.
All the best
Dear ReScience/submissions
Thank you for the reviewer invitation. Unfortunately, I am unable to commit to this at this point due to several other constraints. Sorry about that. Thanks for understanding.
Kind Regards Khimya
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 1:06 AM Alejandra Ramirez @.***> wrote:
Dear all,
thank you very much for the invitation to review the article. Nonetheless, this time I won’t be able to review it due to time constraints.
All the best
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/issues/73#issuecomment-1695232567, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABXGQYWVIREACGKTWNCX2BDXXRGSBANCNFSM6AAAAAAYMACVK4 . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
@oliviaguest You can try to ask all the reviewers at once to check if someone willing to review.
@natbprice do you have capacity?
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 08:13 Olivia Guest @.***> wrote:
dear @ReScience/reviewers https://github.com/orgs/ReScience/teams/reviewers can anybody take this on? 😊
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ReScience/submissions/issues/73#issuecomment-1722463601, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACL2TNL4VCKSX2CBK7VSB23X23SQBANCNFSM6AAAAAAYMACVK4 . You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
I would be willing to review this submission. But do note that I might be largely unreachable between Oct 20 to end-November. I can have my initial review submitted prior to this period.
[Edit on Sep 26] As the upcoming weeks are going to be busy, I would no longer be available for review during this period. I can revisit this in December if needed.
I would be happy to review this. However, we should have a "compute requirements" section as well in the submission process to better understand what resources reviewers might need.
I am sorry for taking so long to check this, I have been unwell. Apologies, to all above.
@HaoZeke and @appukuttan-shailesh thank you for offering to review this. Please let me know if you need any help. Please see here for some information: https://rescience.github.io/edit/ ☺️
Hi @oliviaguest, As I had updated on my post above, I am currently away and won't be able to take this up prior to December. Also, once back I would be shifting to a new city and therefore might be slow on proceeding with this. I would therefore recommend appointing another reviewer to speed things along. If in case nobody volunteers by December, I will be willing to take it up on my return.
@oliviaguest @appukuttan-shailesh @HaoZeke Happy new year all and gentle reminder for the review. If we can target end of January that would be cool since we'll soon transition to a new website.
@rougier, @oliviaguest : I am afraid I won't be able to attend to this in the short term. As mentioned previously I have just moved to take up a new position, and therefore a bit occupied at the moment. It would be best to appoint another reviewer for a faster evaluation.
Dear editors, Dear @rougier, Dear @oliviaguest, Any news from the reviewing process? I wish you all a nice day! Best regards mehdi
@HaoZeke Are tou still availabe to review? If so you can start (don't wait for secodn reviewer I mean). If you could do it in two weeks that would wonderful. @oliviaguest Can you find another reviewer or should be broadcast to all reviewers ?
@rougier can reviewers be tagged like this @ReScience/reviewers? If so, that's great. Please if anyone has the time and capacity, please let us know. 😊
Another solution would be to ask one of ReScience published author if he/she is willing to review.
I can review this work, should be able to return the review by the end of March.
