submissions icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
submissions copied to clipboard

[Re] Predictive model for the size of bubbles and droplets created in microfluidic T-junctions

Open schackartk opened this issue 2 years ago • 15 comments

Original article: van Steijn V., Kleijn C.R., Kreutzer M.T., Predictive model for the size of bubbles and droplets created in microfluidic T-junctions. Lab Chip, 2010,10, 2513-2518

Full text PDF available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45114766_Predictive_model_for_the_size_of_bubbles_and_droplets_created_in_microfluidic_T-junctions

PDF URL: https://github.com/schackartk/t-junction_model_replication/blob/master/article/article.pdf Metadata URL: https://github.com/schackartk/t-junction_model_replication/blob/master/article/metadata.yaml Code URL: https://github.com/schackartk/t-junction_model_replication/tree/master

Scientific domain: Microfluidics, mathematical modeling Programming language: Python Suggested editor: Lorena Barba Suggested reviewers: Vamsi Spandan and Kyle Niemeyer

schackartk avatar Mar 13 '23 19:03 schackartk

Tagging coauthor, @kkaarj.

schackartk avatar Mar 14 '23 14:03 schackartk

Thanks your for your submission and very sorry for the delay, I did not see it initially. We'll assign an editor soon.

rougier avatar Mar 27 '23 09:03 rougier

@labarba Could you edit this submission, two reviewers have been proposed and I can handle publication afterwards.

rougier avatar Mar 27 '23 09:03 rougier

hi @rougier – I'm juggling a fairly heavy workload of service right now. I can be handling editor if the author is willing to be patient...

labarba avatar Apr 16 '23 20:04 labarba

Hi @labarba, thank you for your willingness to be the editor for our manuscript. We are not pressed for time and can be patient, but we don't wish to overburden you. So, @rougier, if you have any other potential editors in mind we would be open to that as well. Whatever you see fit will work for us!

schackartk avatar Apr 18 '23 15:04 schackartk

@labarba Thansk for quick answer, I'll try to find another editor and come back to you if unlucky. @schackartk I'll try to invite other editors.

rougier avatar Apr 20 '23 15:04 rougier

@ThomasA Could you handle this submission? I know it's not directly your domain but Lorena is quite busy right now.

rougier avatar Apr 20 '23 15:04 rougier

Hi @rougier I just wanted to check in and see if we may want to try requesting another editor?

schackartk avatar Aug 02 '23 17:08 schackartk

Sorry for delay and thanks for the reminder.

@ReScience/editors Dear editor, we would need someone to edit this submission that might be a bit out of your domain but we'll find reviewers. @schackartk Could you suggest some reviewers (from the board of from outside)?

rougier avatar Aug 24 '23 09:08 rougier

@schackartk Don't hesitate to remind me.

rougier avatar Aug 24 '23 09:08 rougier

@rougier This is close enough to my (former) field of work that I can handle this as an editor, but I wouldn't be able to propose suitable reviewers any more, as the people I might come up with are probably retired by now.

khinsen avatar Aug 24 '23 18:08 khinsen

Thankss. We can work together with @schackartk to find reviewers. Also, @labarba might be able to suggest some reviewers.

rougier avatar Aug 25 '23 04:08 rougier

I would suggest the following potential reviewers,

From the board:

  • Vamsi Spandan
  • Kyle Niemeyer
  • Tarandeep Singh Kalra

Outside:

  • Alexander Day (GitHub: aday913)
  • Patarajarin Akarapipad (GitHub: patarajarina)
  • Katie Sosnowski (GitHub: Katie-Sosnowski)

In the spirit of transparency, the suggested outside reviewers are former colleagues of the authors.

schackartk avatar Sep 18 '23 18:09 schackartk

Thanks @schackartk for the suggestions!

khinsen avatar Sep 20 '23 15:09 khinsen

@nadnaps @kyleniemeyer @tarankalra1 Would any of you like to review this submission?

khinsen avatar Sep 20 '23 15:09 khinsen