Ray

Yes. This need some discussion. Integration tests _should not_ be brittle as that more or less means they are not effectively proving what you want to have verified. BTW: for...

Had a quick peek: `nilify_blanks` hasn't been updated for some years, so I presume it is no longer maintained. The `normalize_attribute` seems a way better candidate and also adds options...

@j-haacker Which value (exactly) do you use in the setting?

I expect `50` to be working. As the issue mentions, which you referred to, the meaning of the field has changed over time, thus introducing these kinds of unclarities.

@twothreenine I assume, based on the code, that a small order has been sent while it shouldn't. The comparison fails with this specific input, see my https://github.com/foodcoops/foodsoft/issues/1054#issuecomment-2813127794

Hi @gtoal, as this issue has not, yet, been resolved in this repo, I have reopened it. In case the associated PR, from @speed47, is accepted and merged this issue...

Already duplicate [#25043](https://github.com/keybase/client/issues/25043)

> I'll agree that the code isn't getting as many commits as it was before zoom acquired Keybase, but I wouldn't call it "abandoned" by any means For all intents...

@henning-unicode when I quickly look at the [logs](https://github.com/foodcoops/foodsoft/actions/runs/14793878290/job/41536632367#logs) it seems there are a lot of these: ``` Unexpected inner loop exception: unknown keyword: :type: unknown keyword: :type: ["/home/runner/work/foodsoft/foodsoft/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/apparition-0.6.0/lib/capybara/apparition/page.rb:466:in `block in...

> > We could not test the mollie plugin as we do not have a mollie api key and they don't seem to provide one for testing purposes easily. >...