Raúl Gracia
Raúl Gracia
Closing at the moment, will retake this one when needed. cc/ @abhinb
Thanks @younaman , will report about this internally. At first glance, this looks more related to the Pravega Operator project, rather than to the Pravega core one: https://github.com/pravega/pravega-operator For future...
I have been debugging this issue and added logs to better understand what is going on. At the moment, it looks like the test fails because the `LargeEventWriter` used in...
@pbelgundi I'm not sure if to just close this issue is the right thing to do. You are right, this is an enhancement to be done and probably it is...
@derekm please, look this in case it is useful: https://github.com/pravega/pravega/issues/7032#issuecomment-1491483918 For consistency, I think it would be a good idea to have the same logic for comparing `StreamCuts` both in...
Thanks @sachin-j-joshi , one question before getting into the review: has this been tested with performance test to check for potential regressions and/or for the behavior of the system inducing...
@pbelgundi while I understand the need to scale both Pravega and Bookkeeper based on the workload, I'm unsure that coupling the Pravega Operator to Bookkeeper again is the way to...
Hi @davideduma, sorry for the late reply and thanks for your interest. If you want to contribute, I recommend you to start with something else, perhaps more accessible, to get...
There is already a `StreamCut` comparison logic implemented in the Controller: https://github.com/pravega/pravega/blob/f9ed2e100cc240f716c43f677c41d18f79c44e41/controller/src/main/java/io/pravega/controller/store/stream/PersistentStreamBase.java#L274 Would it make sense to place this logic in the "shared" package, in the case that both client...
Thanks for the clarification, @cynthia-sg!