Raúl Gracia

@tkaitchuck please, would you mind to do another review to either approve it or request more changes?

@claudiofahey can you address @tkaitchuck comments so we can close this one? I think we are close.

@claudiofahey any updates addressing @tkaitchuck feedback? This one is actually looks close to get merged, wondering if it is worth it to do a last push for it.

@claudiofahey due to issues we had in previous releases merging `develop` into `master`, we have changed the release approach and the current development branch is `dev`. We plan to delete...

@claudiofahey due to issues we had in previous releases merging `develop` into `master`, we have changed the release approach and the current development branch is `dev`. We plan to delete...

@fpj @claudiofahey do we want to merge this for 0.8?

Another instance of this problem: https://github.com/pravega/pravega/pull/5602/checks?check_run_id=1880171446

Another failure for this test: https://github.com/pravega/pravega/pull/5706/checks?check_run_id=1924600037 [log.txt](https://github.com/pravega/pravega/files/6003491/log.txt)

I'm unsure that the description of this issue is accurate because of the following: we are working on an issue that appeared on a Pravega cluster after 24 days of...

I think that I see that could be happening: - This is the append to the cache during Segment Container recovery at the offset that we detect the serialization problem:...