Ben V. Brown

Okay cool there is an issue to do with the PPS profiles. Unsure if its charger side or our PD stack side.

Good question. So it looks like the last two PPS profiles are decoding incorrectly, and the Iron is decoding them as supporting higher wattages than declared on the charger or...

Specifically the difference is  VS  We are decoding it as the latter due to bits 28/29 being 0b01. When I _think_ they should be 0b00.

I think the options are: 1 Add a workaround that mitigates this if EPR hasn't been negotiated 2 If you have a USB-PD test of some kind and confirm what...

Can you try flashing the firmware build from that pr, and testing when you have a chance? you can download it from the bottom of https://github.com/Ralim/IronOS/actions/runs/9188593532?pr=1911

Fantastic to hear. This change shouldn't require you to do anything and should "just work". I'll test this on a few devices here to sanity test but thank you for...

This should now be resolved 🙇🏼 I hope the Iron works well for you 😄

Could it be implemented that way: yes Why isn't it: Don't want to lock up the thread for that long when using an RTOS. Also harder to ensure timing match...

Why though 😂 Like, why should a _library_ be responsible for this? Given this is primarily going to be used on small devices, the duplicated code doesnt feel wise :)

> Is library for "hardware first" or for "user first"? I can operate in any context :). But as OSS developper, wishing to make project popular, i'd prefer "user first"...