[Feature Request] Add Support for EIP-7702 signAuthorization

[arintrongs]

Hey team,

Right now, Rabby can detect wallets using EIP-7702 — which is great — but it doesn’t yet support signing the signAuthorization transaction type.

Having to switch wallets just to signAuthorization and back to use Rabby disrupts what should be a smooth UX. This leads to broken flows for apps that rely on bundlers and gasless tx patterns, especially when using sendCalls from the EOA that's not EIP7702 wallet yet.

Adding signAuthorization support would fix this gap and keep Rabby ahead in wallet UX.

Thanks 🙏

[supakawaiidesu]

+1 please add signAuthorization feat support. Quite a number of apps are not adopting 7702/5792 just because they know it would break rabby wallet support. And its already more simpler just to force people to not use rabby wallet than get people to 1 time install metamask.

[melvinmcrn]

Would be great to have this feature implemented 🙏🏻 @vvvvvv1vvvvvv

[shoenseiwaso]

Or at least, EIP-7702 authorization revocations!

Related MetaMask issue FYI: https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/issues/35520

[milonite]

bump, many apps are not integrating 7702 because rabby doesn't support 7702 smart wallets.

[arintrongs]

Looking forward to hear from Rabby team if it's possible to add this feature to Rabby, this would help improve a lot of web3 UX!