Stephanie Wilde-Hobbs
Stephanie Wilde-Hobbs
I much prefer `getXXX()` and `setXXX()` because: 1. It's java convention: this is not a scala framework, 2. Groovy transforms getters/setters into properties
:+1: for @calclavia's suggestion. Groovy can mixin to classes, I assume scala can too? Implicit classes?
From the scala docs I don't see a way to add methods with macros...
We need many more tutorials and much more detail. We really need to write amazing docs that guide you through how to work in nova.
It's rare that a wrapped object will have no methods. In that case you have two options: - you can just wrap it anyway and add no methods to it...
Could you seperate the changes to bin/crystal and the compiler into seperate commits? The core team might even want them in seperate prs.
@MakeNowJust i'm not sure I understand what the conflict is.
I personally prefer @bew's suggestion. At least, if this PR is blocked on an `OptionParser` enhancement, do that *first*.
If we include the argument types and all the ancillary information which was originally in the full trace we can consider removing the flag. We should separate removing the flag...
> Prefixing all source code with line number I really like this one. What @bew is proposing is that since we have the start/end character indexes of the *part* of...